Transportation Equity Archives - Reconnect Rochester

June 30, 2022 8 Comments

A Resident’s Proposal for a New Mixed-use Trail in Irondequoit

If you’ve ever navigated the world without a car (whether that be for necessity or recreation), you’ve probably had a, “Why can’t I get over there from here?” moment. Guest blogger, Jack Rinaldo, had so many of these “moments” that he actually wrote up a proposal for a new mixed-use trail in Irondequoit, which would connect the eastern edges of Norton Street and Ridge Road. Curious? Read on for the nitty-gritty details in his own words.

Guest Blog by Jack Rinaldo

If you want to walk or bike to or from Southeast Irondequoit, you need to cross 104. There are only three locations to do so, highlighted in red in the picture below. Goodman Street and Culver Road have intersections with on/off ramps for 104. Both of these locations are dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists, no matter if they are on the road or the sidewalk. The other option is Bay Shore Boulevard. This street is calm, but it has huge hills at either end of it, making it unusable for most people.

These barriers cut off the southeast side from the rest of Irondequoit. Would you let your kids use any of the three current routes? I am an experienced and confident cyclist and I will not ride on those sections of Goodman or Culver.

The proposed new trail would run from Norton Street north to Ridge Road. As seen in the picture below, the trail would start just east of the Norton Street/590 onramp. The trail could run very close to the 590 onramp, similar to the Brooks Avenue/390/Erie Canal Trail setup as shown below. It would then run north, connecting with the road that the new Irondequoit town Department of Public Works (DPW) is on. This half mile section would potentially be the only new construction needed.

Once connected to the DPW road, trail users could use that road to reach Ridge Road. Additional sections of trail to the side of the road could be added as well if they are determined to be needed.

This trail would be similar to other local trails near highways such as the Route 390 Trail in Greece, and the Route 104 Trail in Webster.

Example map — Brooks Avenue, 390, & Erie Canal Trail

This new trail would easily connect to the Sea Breeze Drive trail as seen in the picture below. Once at Ridge Road, trail users go 1000 feet west to Kane Drive. Kane Drive is a nice calm street. Once at Kane Drive, they would proceed north until they met the Sea Breeze Drive trail at the Titus Avenue roundabout.

The new trail would also easily connect to the City of Rochester’s Bicycle Boulevards. Heading south, traveling 700 feet west on Norton Street brings you to Helendale Road. Helendale Road is another calm street. Once in the Laurelton neighborhood, use Spencer Road and Whittington Road to directly access the Bicycle Boulevard system on Farmington Road.

To connect the new trail to the other systems above, all that would be needed would be signage directing users along the route.

The newly expanded trail system would also connect all six of the schools in the East Irondequoit School district. Students and families could use the trail to access school facilities for class and extracurricular events.

Irondequoit High School is 400 feet from the Kane Drive/Ridge Road intersection, and a path to the school’s athletic facilities is on Kane Drive.
East Irondequoit Middle school is 1200 feet west of the Norton Road/Helendale Road intersection, then 500 feet up Densmore Road.
Laurelton-Pardee Intermediate School is 1700 feet from the Norton Road/Helendale Road intersection.
Helendale Road Primary School is directly on Helendale Road.
Durand-Eastman Intermediate School is almost directly on the Sea Breeze Drive trail.
Ivan Green Primary School is 1 mile away by safe neighborhood roads from Kane Drive.

The newly expanded system would connect many parks such as Irondequoit Bay Park West, Tryon Park, Durand-Eastman Park, the Lakeside Trail, SeaBreeze Amusement Park, Irondequoit Bay State Marine Park, and the beach at the Irondequoit Bay outlet.

Here is a link illustrating the new trail and it’s connectivity to the town: https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1CTSRzSTvziHLSrxeJaSAt5wvJEjHc9Sd&usp=sharing (best viewed with Google Maps’ cycling layer turned on)

Irondequoit can look at the successes other towns have with trails, such as the new Brickyard Trail in Brighton, as well as the continued use of miles of trail that already exist in the region. Creating the new trail would be a great opportunity for the town to take unutilized land and better connect residents and neighborhoods, while promoting healthy and environmentally friendly transportation. The half mile of construction needed to achieve all of this would be very worth it.

February 15, 2022 1 Comment

Deconstructing the Intractable Issue of Snowed-In Bus Stops

By Arian Horbovetz (The Urban Phoenix)

It’s a sound only heard on the coldest mornings. The thunderous crunch with every step in my massive boots was deafening as I stumbled over the freshly plowed sidewalk snow. Over a foot of newly-fallen snow glistened in the streetlight. I peered through the steam from my latest breath and saw the bus stop in front of me. But as I stumbled closer, I discovered that any chance of relief from the biting breeze was going to be a challenge. The drifting snow, combined with the wall of white stuff created by sidewalk plowing made accessing the bus shelter a difficult proposition, even for a person like myself who is physically capable and adequately protected.

Later that day, I watched as an elderly woman stood in the partially-plowed bike lane on East Henrietta Road, where drivers routinely reach 50mph. The woman was waiting for a bus. The sidewalk adjacent to the perfectly cleared roadway was not only unplowed, the road plows had slung an additional foot of dirty snow on top, making the sidewalk adjacent to the bus stop literally impassable, even for the most agile pedestrian. With each car that passed the woman, I winced, knowing that a single distracted driver could mean disaster.

These observations are the norm rather than the exception in snow-stricken cities like Rochester. Nearly 80 inches of snowfall annually, coupled with the tremendous lack of funding for non-automobile mobility, marginalizes and often endangers residents who rely on the bus. For the 25% of Rochester residents who do not have access to a car, for the elderly who may not have adequate support, and for our disabled citizens, heavy snowfall means an inability to access essential resources.

Whose Job Is It Anyway?

It’s important to note that the issue of bus stop snow removal is symbiotic with the issue of sidewalk snow removal. The City of Rochester code 104-11 clearly places the role of sidewalk snow removal on the adjacent property owner. But too often, property owners are unwilling, unable or unaware of their responsibility to maintain the adjoining public right of way. And while infractions are reportable, they are often not addressed in a timely manner. As in most cities, the snow melts before enforcement leads to a positive outcome.

Additionally, the city provides “supplemental” snow removal of 878 miles of city sidewalk when storms deposit more than 4” of snow. While this is a welcomed service that most cities do not provide, a lack of continued sidewalk snow maintenance means that private driveway plowing companies and icy walking conditions caused by the packing of snow by pedestrians, still makes for treacherous or impassable on-foot experiences.

And finally, nowhere in the code is snow removal from bus stops or bus shelters mentioned specifically. In a recent report by WHEC News 10, RTS Spokesperson Tom Brede “asks” that property owners clear a path to the adjacent bus stops as part of their responsibility to clear the sidewalk. But with the ambiguity and subsequent lack of accountability, any regular bus rider will attest that this action is rarely taken.

How Does It Work In Other U.S. Cities?

As much as Rochester residents are frustrated by winter sidewalk conditions, a 2019 article by Streetsblog USA called Rochester the “clear leader” when it comes to sidewalk snow removal, citing the city’s aforementioned efforts to plow nearly all of its sidewalks in the wake of a heavy snowfall. This is not to downplay the fact that far more needs to be done here in the Flower City, it is more to show just how few cities have the funding or the will to accommodate those who rely on sidewalks and access to public transit.

In a February 2022 WGRZ Buffalo, NY story, NFTA Spokesperson Helen Tederous stated that Buffalo’s code places the responsibility of bus stop snow removal on abutting property owners. But a review of Buffalo’s Article VIII 413-50 “Snow and Ice Removal” resulted in no clear reference to this claim.

While Syracuse has only recently begun taking partial sidewalk snow removal responsibility, The Salt City recently finalized an agreement with a contractor, and will spend up to $650,000 to plow 100 miles of sidewalk.

In Minneapolis Minnesota, if a property owner does not clear their adjacent public sidewalk, the city sends them a warning. If the owner does not comply, a city crew is dispatched to do the job themselves, and a bill is sent. If the bill is ignored, the cost is included in the owner’s next property tax bill. City inspections also commence 24 hours after each snowfall, giving legitimacy to the requirement. The fact that the city takes at least some responsibility in the process of reporting violators is a rare but welcomed level of sidewalk snow removal enforcement.

Our Neighbors To The Northeast

Montreal, Canada has long been heralded as the undisputed champion of snow removal. As one of the snowiest large cities in the world, Montreal is faced with the same challenge that many major U.S. cities incur, but the process in removing the snow is just as robust. A large piece of this process is based on the fact that the city actually removes the snow from streets, sidewalks and bike paths in large trucks and transports it to more than two dozen designated locations around the city. This monumental task begins with signage and notices prior to the storm, warning residents not to park their cars and bikes in the streets or sidewalks. Instead, residents are encouraged to use a system of parking lots and garages free of charge. During and after the snow storm, a fleet of 2,200 snow removal vehicles are dispatched to clear the 10,000 kilometers of roads, sidewalks and bike paths. Yes, that’s right, over half a million Montreal residents use their bikes for transportation rather than recreation, likely due in part to the fact that year-round bike commuting is made more practical by the Titanic snow removal efforts that Montreal employs.

Montreal Snow Removal, courtesy of Zvi Leve

When sidewalks and bike paths are cleared, this allows residents of all socioeconomic levels to access transit with greater ease, creating a more inclusive urban environment. While Canada’s tax structure and municipal funding practices are very different from the United States in many ways, it is encouraging to see that effective snow removal is possible, and leads to better access.

Calming The Storm

While Rochester is considered a leader in sidewalk snow removal, there is still room for a great deal of improvement. One of the key starting points is a more robust definition of who is responsible for bus stop snow removal, and a greater communication to property owners regarding this expectation. Like Minneapolis, regular city-wide snow removal inspections coupled with greater enforcement would likely also improve outcomes. Finally, advocacy is always an important factor in creating change. Consider joining organizations like Reconnect Rochester in their efforts to make our streets, sidewalks and public transit systems accessible and equitable. Together, we can make our city a place where mobility for all is accommodated and uplifted.

August 21, 2020 No Comments

The American Automobile And Racial Exclusivity

The “Pay To Play” cost of the automobile might be the most racially exclusive component of American society.

Written by Arian Horbovetz and originally published on The Urban Phoenix blog.

I saw something today that blew my mind. The average new road vehicle retails for $37,876. Can we say that again? Americans are purchasing cars, trucks and SUVs to the tune of $38,000. In a time when we are asking questions of equity and “pay-to-play” constructs in our American culture, is there anything more exclusive than the automobile?

Most of our focus in life revolves around three basic things… our home, our work and how we connect the two. After World War II, the Federal Government subsidized the construction and purchase of homes outside of city limits in areas now referred to as “the suburbs.” But that wasn’t enough… with major employers still entrenched in urban cores as a matter of practical business, the same administrations facilitated the creation of automobile expressways that allowed white Americans, who could afford cars to access jobs while living in racially exclusive suburbs, to commute efficiently to their employment epicenters. And as no surprise, these highways doubled as a way of demolishing “blighted” black neighborhoods, segregating white from black, and rich from poor in our cities.

Redlining and racial property covenants (among a host of other elements of institutionalized racism) ensured that people of color could not transcend their circumstance, creating an un-traversable economic fissure between wealthy white and struggling black citizens in highly polarized and segregated counties.

Car, oil and rubber companies furthered the plight of inner city America by lobbying for wider roads, campaigning for “jay-walking” to become a public offense and famously purchasing the private city street car companies, only to immediately disband them. All this to ensure that the most expensive and exclusive mode of transportation was virtually the only mode of transportation. And of course, this was all done to the tune of billions of dollars in subsidies for auto-related manufacturers and the building of automobile infrastructure that a huge percentage of the country simply could not afford.

How do you disenfranchise an entire group of people? Simple. Tell them they can only live in one place, (which we as a country did) then incentivize everyone else (and thus American jobs) to move away from that place… and for the final touch, make it too expensive for the disenfranchised population to access good jobs, public resources and any hope of upward mobility. The perfect purposeful recipe for racial, cultural, economic and social isolation.

Let’s go back to the cost of the average new vehicle, $37,876. The average Black household in the U.S. earns $41,511 (2018), less than $4,000 more than the cost of the average American automobile.

Can Americans purchase a used car for much cheaper? Absolutely. But a huge percentage of disenfranchised communities still struggle with high interest rates and all the “extras” that go along with car ownership (insurance, fuel, maintenance, registration fees, etc.). When the process of conveniently commuting requires 40% of your income, something is seriously wrong.

“The financial burden that the car-centric American narrative places on our families is stifling. … Those who can purchase and maintain a car win…everyone else loses.“

As someone who purchased a used car 6 years ago for $7,500 and still occasionally uses that car today, I am in absolute awe of the amount of money my friends spend on cars, trucks and SUVs that I would consider “luxurious.” The financial burden that the car-centric American narrative places on our families is stifling. The amount that middle class American families are willing to spend for the convenience of two SUVs is staggering. But the myth that this choice is a necessity is one of the most racially and socially exclusive economic and psychological constructs in American culture. I would argue that the toxic level of “pay to play” exclusivity in this country is and always has been the veiled mirage of the automobile as the only means of convenient transportation. Those who can purchase and maintain a car win… everyone else loses.

When the average cars costs $38,000, equity is not possible. When the average commute of 23 minutes by car is an hour and twenty minutes by bus, equity is not possible. In a nation where Black Americans were disallowed to thrive in our urban cores, this same social and economic rift occurs today with regard to transportation and the convenient access of jobs and services.

Redlining derailed black neighborhoods by placing a financial ceiling on their communities. Property covenants and other restrictions disallowed people of color from moving to other neighborhoods. The war on drugs targeted black males in a conscious effort to disrupt black families. Today, in a world where mobility is such a strong determinant for success, the century-long subsidization of the most expensive and exclusive form of transportation continues to add yet another wrinkle in the fabric of blatantly racist agendas that our country has supported.

“Want to make the United States more equitable? Support public transit that serves everyone.”

It’s time to realize that the American automobile, and the immense infrastructure that facilitates its transportation dominance, might be one of the most toxically racial tools this country has ever seen. Want to make the United States more equitable? Support public transit that serves everyone. Support walkability and infrastructure projects that limit automobile speed and prioritize pedestrians, especially in traditionally minority-based neighborhoods. Support urban density that considers the needs and desires of Black Americans. The American car/truck/SUV has pummeled the core of U.S. urban density… let’s realize this as a mistake and get aggressive about building a more equitable future of mobility in our urban centers!

A few related notes and resources from Reconnect Rochester. . .

We appreciate this excellent piece by Arian at The Urban Phoenix that makes new and insightful connections between mobility and racial & economic justice.

Over the past five years, Reconnect Rochester has been part of an effort to examine the relationship between transportation and poverty in our community, to better understand the problem so we can identify possible solutions, and act on them. Resources this effort has generated can be found here on Reconnect’s website and include:

An in-depth report by the Center for Governmental Research: Transportation & Poverty in Monroe County: How Land Use, Job Locations, and Commuting Options Affect Access to Jobs
A 30 minute locally produced documentary film that focuses on the lives of three Rochesterians to give us a firsthand look at what life is like when you can barely afford to buy a bus pass, much less a car.

Our efforts continue through the Rochester-Monroe Anti-Poverty Initiative (RMAPI)’s transportation work group. In collaboration with many community partners around the table, we work to translate the report learnings into systemic policy recommendations and actions that can create real change.

July 27, 2020 No Comments

Bike Share Will Rise Again in ROC

by Arian Horbovetz, Reconnect Rochester Board Member and author of The Urban Phoenix blog

If you’re like me, a firm believer that public transit, walkability and bike Infrastructure can make our city better, the last few months have been grueling. Empty buses, the encouragement of single-passenger automobile ridership, and the loss of Zagster’s Pace bike share here in Rochester have us all wondering about the future of multi-dimensional mobility in our city.

Zagster’s abrupt departure from Rochester’s landscape earlier this year was a shock to many who believed that bike share made The Flower City a better place. The freedom of grabbing a couple bikes while enjoying an evening downtown, or filling the last mile gap on your daily commute is suddenly absent.

The hope had been that 2020 would bring a fresh new season of bike share, and possibly scooter share to the Rochester transportation network, but the pandemic that is upon us had other plans. Shortly after it was announced that the start of the Pace bike share season would be delayed, Zagster abruptly pulled the plug on the program altogether, stating that the company was “reassessing its business model.” While Rochester actively searches for a new bike share vendor, here are some key points to understand about the Zagster/Pace departure.

It’s Not Our Fault

Zagster is a venture capital company, which is a business model that can quickly rocket a good idea to soaring heights. The downside is an increased level of volatility, which can lead to these kinds of aforementioned “reassessments,” or even closures without warning. The unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 crisis has caused a massive ripple in our nation’s economy, one that has caused every business to make drastic changes and hard decisions. This was noted as a key reason for Zagster’s departure from Rochester, as well as ceasing operations in other mid-sized cities like Norfolk, VA. On May 27, Zagster formally announced its closure as a company.

Rochester’s Ridership Was Remarkable

Over the past three years, Pace bikes settled into our local culture as an easy, convenient way to get around. Over 22,000 Rochester residents activated accounts over the three years Zagster was operating in our city, and those customers took a remarkable 116,951 trips.

At Zagster’s end-of-season report in November 2019, it was reported that “Pace Rochester continues to be Zagster’s most utilized bike share fleet in the country, with 189 trips taken daily!” Rochester riders totaled more than 40,000 trips in 2019 alone. Company representatives often described Rochester as Zagster’s “flagship” mid-sized city for our ridership numbers.

An end of year user survey in 2019 revealed that “half of all trips replaced the use of a personal or shared vehicle,” highlighting just how important the service was to the transportation landscape in the City of Rochester. And ridership mapping suggests that many Rochesterians heavily used the bike share to get to suburban job locations, like Marketplace Mall in Henrietta.

Bike Share Theft Happens Everywhere

Midway through the 2019 season, empty bike racks and “ghost bikes” (bikes that appeared on the Pace App but were not physically present) revealed a rash of rampant bicycle theft. Nearly two-thirds of Pace’s Rochester fleet was stolen, leading to a sea of bad press and public doubt.

While the stories of significant theft, followed by Zagster’s subsequent departure caused many Rochester residents to believe the two were related, it’s important to remember that bike share theft happens everywhere. Wherever there is something of public value, there will always be a select few in any community who will try to pilfer it. While the theft of Pace bikes in Rochester was difficult, it was not at all uncommon. The onus is on the bike share provider to anticipate this construct and design their equipment with safeguards. But the lack of a GPS tracking device on Pace bikes made solving the problem through recovery and prosecution of theft nearly impossible. The next vendor will need to have more anti-theft technology built into their bikes.

We Will Have Bike Share Again

Fear not… Rochester will have bike share again. And very likely, e-bikes and e-scooters will be added to the menu. The City Of Rochester is actively searching for a new operator with which to partner, and word on the street is that we may see a limited launch for a few months this fall, and a fully operational system in place by spring 2021.

This Is Not Another Fast Ferry

While we may fall victim to the Fast Ferry narrative of “this is why we can’t have nice things,” we must realize that the challenges that walk hand in hand with bike share are not unique to our city. Zagster’s departure should not be seen as a failure to retain a valued resource, but rather a chance to connect with a new brand that is better equipped to handle the nuances of bike share in mid-sized cities. So before we internalize the loss of Pace bike share as a Flower City Failure, let’s remember the big picture that was three years of successful bike share utilization in our city.

We know one thing for sure… Rochester’s stint with Zagster showed us all how vital a role bike share plays in the transportation fabric of the city. While also serving as a tremendous recreational draw, bike share’s ability to connect residents and visitors to work, home, destinations and other modes of transit makes it a powerful piece of transportation infrastructure for Rochester.

May 7, 2020 No Comments

With Our Own Eyes and Lungs: The Benefits of Reduced Motor Traffic

Guest blog by Doug Kelley, Associate Professor, University of Rochester.

In my first few long bike rides this spring, I’ve been bowled over by the beautiful views. And it’s not like I’m visiting new places. I pedaled these same routes last summer, when I first came to Copenhagen for a yearlong sabbatical and was eager to explore. But never were the vistas like this! Now, the hills and buildings of Sweden, 10 miles across the waters of Øresund, are not just blurry shapes, but clear and distinct and colorful. Now, looking southwest from the gorgeous seaside bike path in Naturpark Amager, I can see the towns of Køge and Strøby across the bay, nearly 20 miles distant and never visible before. First noticing these fantastic vistas, I gave thanks for the end of the dark and rainy Danish winter. Then I remembered that visibility was never this good last August or September. Something else must be happening. That something is probably covid-19.

The coast of Sweden, bright and clearly visible across Øresund from a marina north of Copenhagen. Clearer air, improved respiratory health, and lower carbon emissions all come when motor traffic is reduced, as the pandemic is showing us.

The pandemic is causing profound suffering worldwide, through death and sickness, through separation and hardship. I would not wish it upon anyone. The pandemic is also giving humankind a unique opportunity to see — firsthand — what our lives look like when motor traffic is significantly reduced. Few are driving, which means less air pollution, and we can see the improvement with our own eyes. It’s visible all over, not just on my weekend bike routes but in places like London, Delhi, Wuhan, and Los Angeles. My wife tells me her lungs feel better now as she strolls along formerly-busy roads. Back home, nitrogen dioxide emissions in Rochester are down 30%. NASA data shows similar trends all over the world. Social media is awash in before-and-after photos picturing how much better our views have gotten thanks to reduced motor traffic. Mount Kenya is spectacular.

“The pandemic is giving humankind a unique opportunity to see — firsthand — what our lives look like when motor traffic is significantly reduced.“

With those views come other important benefits. The micron-scale airborne particles that mar our vistas also wreak havoc on our health. They are the most harmful form of air pollution, penetrating deep into the lungs and blood to cause heart attacks and respiratory disease. One study found that for particles with diameters smaller than 2.5 microns, every airborne concentration decrease of 10 micrograms per cubic meter comes with a 36% decrease in lung cancer. Another study estimated that reducing particle pollution by just 1 microgram per cubic meter would prevent 34,000 premature deaths per year in the United States. So ironically, reduced motor traffic due to the pandemic may actually save as many lives as are lost to covid-19. That’s a speculation, but given what we know, entirely plausible.

Moreover, the health benefits of reduced traffic tend to be greatest for the very people who are suffering most in the covid-19 pandemic. Air pollution links to higher covid-19 death rates and almost certainly plays a role in black Americans dying of covid-19 at higher rates than white Americans. Even aside from the virus, low-income people suffer disproportionately from respiratory diseases, including asthma. Substantially reduced particle pollution is good for everybody — and especially good for those with the most urgent health needs.

“Substantially reduced particle pollution is good for everybody — and especially good for those with the most urgent health needs.“

Reducing motor traffic also comes with the obvious benefits of reducing carbon emissions and slowing climate change. The International Energy Agency estimates that greenhouse gas emissions will be 8% lower worldwide in 2020 than in 2019, mainly due to reduced motor traffic and airline travel. Climate change is a long-established scientific fact, and its extreme weather and eerily warm winters are now nearly as evident in firsthand experience as the vistas on my bike rides. A one-year, 8% drop isn’t enough to solve the world’s climate change problem, but it’s a step in the right direction.

“A one-year, 8% drop [in greenhouse gas emissions] isn’t enough to solve the world’s climate change problem, but it’s a step in the right direction.“

Clear views of the coast of Sweden, in the distance across Øresund, on a sunny May afternoon at the beach in Denmark. Holding onto our reduced-motor-traffic lifestyles would mean better health, lower carbon emissions, and more beautiful days like this.

Living through this historic moment, when we literally see the good of reduced motor traffic with our own eyes, I can’t help but wonder: What if we hold on to the good, and hold on tight? As social distancing eases and we venture out of our homes more often, what if we do it without so much motor traffic? What if we reboot our economy and jobs and schooling without ruining our own vistas and attacking our own lungs?

“As social distancing eases and we venture out of our homes more often, what if we do it without so much motor traffic?”

The pandemic has taught us that for many jobs and in many cases, we can work from home just fine. The pandemic has taught us that some travel is more trouble than it’s worth. What if, instead of using the pandemic as an excuse for more pollution, we enact laws and regulations that clean our air? What if we go more places by walking and biking and public transportation? What if we build on our momentum? It would mean new thinking about topics like achieving social distancing on buses and trains. It would mean living in a new way. But the lifestyle adjustments involved are far smaller and simpler than the ones we have already achieved, surviving this unprecedented pandemic together.

We can get started right now.

Here are a few ways to build on great work already happening in our region:

Walk or bike or take the bus on three trips this week — or the next three trips you take, if you’re at home this week — when you might otherwise have used a motor vehicle.
Contact your county legislator, state assembly member, and state senator to urge them to sign this letter asking Gov. Cuomo to phase out fossil fuels while ramping up renewable energy and energy efficiency — or thank them if they already have.
Email County Executive Adam Bello to thank him for urging Monroe County to join the state Climate Smart Communities program.
Email County Legislator and Reconnect Advisor Rachel Barnhart in support of better broadband infrastructure for easier telecommuting.
Contact RTS to thank them for putting clean, electric buses in their fleet — and urge more.
Tell your school district you want clean, electric school buses. Email community advocate Kathryn Rygg to learn more.
While children are out of school during the pandemic, teach them to walk and bike safely (ideas here and here), then link up with Flower City Family Cycling for future rides.
Take a class on safe cycling from an instructor certified by the League of American Bicyclists.
Leave a comment thanking the City of Rochester for their Bike Rochester work — and urge more.
Learn how to Go All Electric with the Rochester People’s Climate Coalition.
Sign up to help with the next Complete Streets Makeover.
Donate to Reconnect Rochester!

The benefits would be huge. Cleaner-feeling lungs, fewer respiratory diseases, better quality of life, reduced chance of climate change causing harder times even than the covid-19 pandemic. And big, clear, beautiful vistas. I think we can do it.

There are many more ways to take action. Leave comments below with your own suggestions.

Read more about the Kelley family’s Danish experience in an earlier blog post: Copenhagen transportation: A day in one family’s life.

April 3, 2020 No Comments

Can Public Transit Survive COVID-19?

Authored by Arian Horbovetz, Reconnect Rochester Board Member

In these suddenly uncertain times, the urbanist virtues of density and public transit are negated by the public responsibility of social distancing. The idea that our cities are cooperative centers of shared innovation, inspiration and collective efficiency has suddenly given way to the real and justifiable fears of physical proximity and viral transmission. Suddenly, many of the qualities that make cities amazing places are the very things that can also promote the spread of the Coronavirus.

Estimates for transit are grim. Transit agencies across the country are likely seeing an estimated 50%- 90% decrease in ridership. And this is after a 20-year increase in transit utilization suddenly took a dive around 2015, largely due to the popularity of ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft. This viral gut-punch will likely be another blow to the vital community resource that is public transportation.

Last week, however, the Federal Government passed a $2-trillion COVID-19 economic stabilization plan, including $25-billion in assistance for public transit. The initial draft of this bill did not include any funding for transit, but staunch and persistent outcry from agencies and advocates across the country led to this tremendous victory in the final version. While not alleviating the economic impact completely, this stimulus will likely keep public transit in most cities from running aground.

Why Is This Important?

Experts estimate that transit agencies will lose $26-$38 billion in revenue as a result of the necessary steps of social distancing, remote work and the closing of non-essential businesses. While this is a monumental blow to the already-strained budgets of nearly every transit system in the nation, it would likely be one that many small-to-midsized cities simply could not overcome. Without the aforementioned assistance from the Federal Government, transit agencies across the nation would have to discontinue important routes and services.

An estimated 36% of transit riders are workers in essential industries such as health care. In a time when our hospital capacities are being pushed to their limits and the presence of essential staff is critical, the importance of reliable public transportation cannot be overstated.

What About Long Term?

The seamless functionality of public transit during this period of uncertainty is tremendously important for public health. But when we finally mitigate the spread of this virus and begin the return to societal normalcy, we will need public transit to help facilitate the economic recovery of our communities. Getting people back to work, back to more frequent trips to stores and fun nights out with friends will all be partially dependent on public transit to help sew the fabric of cities like Rochester back together. A high-functioning RTS bus network here in our community will be a critical safety net, softening the horrific economic impact the coronavirus has already inflicted on our city. Transit can help families do what they need to do now, so that when this time passes, those same families are more likely to fully recover and regenerate our local economy.

Speaking Of RTS

RTS was expected to roll out their long-awaited Reimagine RTS system re-design plan on June 29th of this year, with revised routes, increased frequency on popular routes and “mobility zones” in outlying areas. In a statement last week, RTS CEO Bill Carpenter announced that the rollout of this new plan would be delayed indefinitely.

RTS has, however, remained dedicated to providing riders with regular service while adding more frequent and thorough cleanings of buses and facilities while temporarily waiving fares on all routes.

Pace Bike Share

On March 26, Pace Bike Share announced it would be suspending all rental services for the foreseeable future, and further news reports delivered worse news that Pace will be pulling out of the Rochester market altogether. This development removes another piece of active transportation and connectivity in our city for the time being.

Public Transit’s Recovery

Just when cities like Rochester were beginning to have meaningful conversations about the tremendous social and economic benefits of public transportation, the pandemic we now face will likely have a lasting impact on how we view and interact with public spaces. Since the nature of public transit is physically shared mobility, with close seats, handrails and pull-cords, the understandable long-term stigma generated by the pandemic may mean that riders who can afford to choose more individualized transportation will do so, at least in the short term. In the future, public transit agencies may have to feature newer, cleaner buses, trains and facilities to mitigate what is likely to be a lasting psychological aversion to touching and interacting with public surfaces. And while this aversion will lessen with time, how we, the rider, approach the choice to take public transit from the perspective of our personal health, may never be the same.

We Need Public Transportation

The $25 billion emergency public transit infusion from the federal government that will help to lessen the blow during this difficult period was made possible only by staunch advocacy from organizations and individuals who know the importance of transit in our communities. Those of us who understand transit’s inherent ability to promote equity and mobility options for Rochester and beyond must continue to advocate politically, socially and personally for a robust commitment to public transportation.

Finally, in this time, it is important to remember that many of the folks who are on the front lines, keeping us safe, healthy, and well fed, are the people who rely on public transportation for their everyday commute. And when this difficult time passes, public transit will, as it always has, play in an integral role in Rochester’s economic recovery, connecting people to jobs and resources.

Our city will always be stronger and more adaptable when we have an abundance of mobility options. When our diverse community of citizens are empowered with transportation choices, our Rochester will always be more successful, more equitable and more resilient. We will get through this… and when we do, we will need public transit to do what it has always done, and more.

December 30, 2019 No Comments

The Great Things We Accomplished in 2019

As we look back on 2019, we’re amazed at what we’ve been able to accomplish together this year. The highlights below are just a snapshot of all the good work we’ve been able to do, thanks to the financial support of Reconnect members, the passionate volunteers that make our programs and initiatives run, and so many others that engaged in our work in countless ways. Thanks to each and every one of you.

Sponsored a Cornell University Design Connect project to help the Brighton community create a vision for Monroe Ave., with an improved street design and streetscape that is more vibrant and safer for pedestrians and cyclists.

For the third year in a row, we crowdsourced funds to sponsor two bike share stations on Hudson Avenue & Adams Street. Plus, this fall we broadcast a live presentation and Q&A with Pace to recap Rochester’s 2019 bike share season.

Hosted a packed Rochester Street Films screening of The Trolley that sparked community conversation about modern streetcars making a comeback in American life, and the history and future of streetcars in Rochester.

Helped shape two transformational local planning initiatives by giving direct input and promoting public engagement: the Reimagine RTS system re-design (coming to fruition in June 2020), and the transportation and mobility aspects of the City of Rochester’s 2034 Comprehensive Plan.

In collaboration with many neighborhood and community partners, we brought our Complete Streets Makeover to N. Clinton Ave., implementing temporary street design changes to make it safer, and building community in the process.

Weighed in on the prospect of e-scooters coming to Rochester by offering common sense, research-based input about how our community might integrate this new micro-mobility option it in a safe, smart way.

Fought for the transit dependent in our community by traveling to Albany with Our Streets Transit Coalition partners, spreading awareness of the New Yorkers for Better Public Transit campaign, and stepping into a leadership role on the Rochester-Monroe Anti-Poverty Initiative transportation work group.

Continued working with a powerful coalition of partners on the Drive 2B Better public awareness campaign to make our streets safer to walk and bike. We collaborated with many of the same partners in the planning and implementation of this year’s Active Transportation Summit.

Gave transit riders a respectable place to sit at our 30+ seasonal bus stop cubes placed around the city. We also worked with a local fiberglass manufacturer to create a permanent cube design as a year-round solution, and have plans to get the first 15 cubes on the ground in spring 2020!

Joined forces with Rochester Cycling Alliance to work side-by-side as transportation alternative superheroes! We added power to our growing organization when we welcomed Jesse Peers as Cycling Coordinator.

Engaged with the public every day via live events, community outreach tabling, speaking engagements, media interviews, social media sharing, and blog posts about things like “sneckdowns”, living car-free in ROC, and driving’s dehumanizing effect.

…And this doesn’t count the untold number of advocacy actions we take day in and day out to advocate for the things we all care about, like a robust public transportation system, streets that are safe for everyone, and a community that’s built to be multi-modal.

But now we’re just bragging.

Help Us Keep the Momentum Going in 2020!

Become a Reconnecter

February 10, 2018 3 Comments

The City of Rochester Public Market: An Important Example and Experiment in Our Community

Guest essay submitted by: Evan Lowenstein, Reconnect Rochester Member and Assistant Market Supervisor for Communications and Special Events/Projects, City of Rochester Public Market…

The City of Rochester Public Market is an endearing, fascinating example of the many things planners value and work for: successful public places and spaces; sense of place; mixed use; real and working diversity; pedestrian-focused; linkage of city, suburbs, and rural areas; supportive of the local economy.

While the Market has made strides in multi-modal transportation access by creating a pedestrian, bicycle, and transit-friendly Market, there is a lot of work to do. The Market can and should be a true leader in moving the community forward in its transportation mindsets and methods.

September 3, 2017 6 Comments

Where They Stand: 2017 Candidates for Rochester

Reconnect Rochester surveyed all candidates for Rochester’s Mayor and City Council to learn where they stand on issues related to transportation and mobility.

Questions were designed to give the candidates the opportunity to share their opinions, ideas and vision for a well-connected and accessible community. Surveys were sent to all campaign teams on August 2. We did our best to make contact with all of the candidates. After several follow up attempts, the responses we have received are posted below.

We hope this information will help you make an informed decision when you head to the polls this November – and/or next Tuesday (9/12) for the Democratic primary. Don’t want to wait until election day? Take our Voter Poll right now (just for fun).

Click on the candidate names below to read their full, unedited responses. Candidates are listed in alphabetical order…

Candidates for Mayor:

Rachel Barnhart

Candidate Email: Rachel@rachelformayor.com

Website: RachelForMayor.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

Our current public transit system is not set up to address the needs of our residents, many of whom are forced to work and shop in the suburbs. We need a network that better connects people to jobs and services. We need a network with various hubs. We need a network that accommodates pedestrians and cyclists. We need a network enjoyed by all.

We must introduce planning and transit into discussions about awarding incentives to companies relocating or expanding. We need a mayor who will advocate for locating jobs and services in the city, near transit lines and population centers.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Our greatest challenge is that we have a community that prioritizes the automobile. This has had enormous economic, social and environmental costs.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

We must fight for Rochester’s share of transportation funding from the state and federal government. We must prioritize pedestrians and cyclists when building infrastructure.

What steps can the City take to improve accessibility to jobs for residents who do not own cars? And, what steps can the City take to encourage residents who own cars to increase their use of alternative modes of transportation?

In addition to building infrastructure, the city has to advocate to locate jobs in the city, on transit lines and near where people live.

The city should encourage the University of Rochester, Wegmans and other employers to give workers free bus passes. By adding infrastructure, such as protected bike lanes, more people will feel safe to ride bicycles.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

I don’t think downtown has a parking problem. It has a walking problem. People think nothing of parking at Eastview Mall and walking the equivalent of a half mile to get to a store. We need a mental reset about what it means to visit a downtown. That said, it’s worth exploring a downtown circular to transport people among venues and garages.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Traffic deaths are not “accidents.” They’re preventable tragedies. They’re unacceptable. They’re not inevitable. That’s how the city will treat fatal and serious injury crashes under Vision Zero Rochester. The first Vision Zero program started in Sweden in the late 1990s. Now there are Vision Zero programs in many cities. The aim of Vision Zero is to have zero deaths and serious injuries in road traffic. Vision Zero takes a multi-disciplinary approach to traffic safety. It recognizes that people make mistakes. Instead of blaming victims, we will improve the system to mitigate human error. Using education, enforcement, design, technology and policies, we can make our streets safe for everyone – while not impeding mobility.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

Reducing reliance on cars makes for a healthier, more equitable city.

Do you support a “Vision Zero” style approach to road safety, which includes a 25 mph speed limit on residential streets in the City and other traffic calming practices and policies? Why or why not?

Yes.

See above.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

Adding bike infrastructure promotes activity, social equity, cleaner air and vibrant street life.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

Road diets slow traffic, making us safer, and they improve property values and walkability. East Main Street desperately needs a road diet.

What steps (if any) do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

As noted above, we should encourage employers to spring for bus passes. We can also ask them to include facilities for bikes and provide incentives for carpooling.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Tony Micciche

Candidate Email: TonyForMayor.us

Website: TonyForMayor.us

Unfortunately we did not receive a response from Tony Micciche.

James Sheppard

Candidate Email: info@sheppardforrochester.com

Website: www.SheppardForRochester.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

Rochester’s transportation network must address the needs of all of our citizens with an eye toward dramatically reducing carbon emissions (see my environmental platform, “Green Rochester Inside and Out,” available on www.sheppardformayor.com). My vision for the City is that all of our residents will have inexpensive and accessible choices for getting where they need to go, for work and play.

We are fortunate to have a community of smart, creative and engaged citizens who are passionate about this issue, the members of Reconnect Rochester among them. Within the first six months of taking office, I will hold a Transportation Roundtable to bring stakeholders together, including RR, RGRTA, Genesee Transportation Council, residents, business owners, transportation experts and others to evaluate our current transport network, review the plans that are in the works, and determine an action plan for moving forward. I don’t have all the answers but there are people right here in this community who have a lot of expertise and interest and are willing to share it.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

An aging infrastructure and high poverty. We have significant capital needs that are difficult to address when our tax base is shrinking, which often forces us to prioritize emergency repairs. That being said, other communities have gotten creative with their financing of transportation projects and aggressive with their State and federal funding requests, and we can too.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

The City needs to play a leadership role as transportation directly impacts the quality of life of our residents and the long-term environmental health of our community. The City in particular must demand equity in regional transportation planning efforts, as our residents are often the least served and most in need. We must ensure our residents are at the table, whether they want to put roads on a ‘diet’ and increase bike lanes, or increased bus service and updated shelters. We need to ensure that our residents are empowered and actively involved in solving Rochester’s transportation needs.

We need to do a better job of working with major employers and the business community to identify the current and future needs of their employees. They know as well as we do the challenges their employees face in getting to work on time and on budget; employees who can get to work easily are more likely to show up and stay employed. Once we have a more thorough understanding of what our current and future needs are, we can plan accordingly, working with RTS, and using van pools, car sharing and bike sharing alternatives.

The City can be an active leader in promoting alternative modes of transportation through events such as “Bike to Work” days, free public transportation periods, and “Celebrity Van Pools,” as has been done in other communities. In promoting our own special events, information can be shared on the availability of bike sharing stations, bus and circulator routes, and openly encouraging attendees to leave their cars at home. Often the biggest barrier to using alternative transportation is the fear of the unknown – once people know others are using different options, and they try them for themselves, they become our most regular and vocal users!

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

Our downtown should be a place where people feel comfortable, and indeed enjoy, walking around. When they do, it will not be a problem for them to park farther away and walk; take the bus downtown and walk from a stop; or bicycle around as much as possible. Creating any new parking lots or garages will be a last resort as we promote alternative transportation and reduce our dependence on parking downtown.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Parking enforcement should be prioritized as a quality of life issue. It must be enforced fairly, appropriately, and consistently.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

It just makes sense as downtown continues to grow.

Yes.

We need to make a serious commitment to neighborhood safety and this is one important way to do it.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

We need to encourage bicycling as a viable transportation alternative and make sure cyclists are safe.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

It will both improve safety and encourage alternative forms of transportation. We need to prioritize our major corridors using safety data.

We should pursue incentives for employees who use alternative forms of transportation – “dress down” days; restaurant coupons; Mayoral recognition, etc.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Thank you for all of the good work that you do keeping transportation issues at the forefront and supporting neighborhood safety!

Lori F. Thomas

Candidate Email: thomas4mayor@rochester.rr.com

Website: www.Thomas4Mayor.wordpress.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

Fewer cars, more public transportation, cleaner streets during winter months and pothole elimination.

Ride sharing, working with RTS to committ busses to larger areas with more work accomodating schedules, making sure street plows clear streets curb to curb, and patching potholes during winter months and creating a rotating maintenance schedule of repair during spring and summer months.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

The extensive traffic coming in and going out of Rochester from suburban neighborhoods, excessive speeds on neighborhood streets and the excessive use of school buses during peak travel hours.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

Advocating in Albany for a change in speed limits for neighborhood streets and appropriating enough funding to improve and maintain city streets.

Working with RTS to committ to better scheduling of times and routes.

Providing incentives for ride sharing and the use of public transportation.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

Increasing public transportation and ride sharing opportunities will decrease the need for downtown parking.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Traffic enforcement is key to reducing accidents and creating safer neighborhoods. This is a top priority.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

No.

Currently our population would not support these venues.

Yes.

This will decrease accidents and insure the safety of neighborhood children.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

Bicycle traffic has increased over the years and with the current cooperation with Zagster, bicycle lane expansion is a necessity.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

Rochester has undergone significant changes in road design that have impeded the effective and efficient travel of citizens and visitors. I believe that a more effective and efficient system needs to be considered in order to improve the safety of our citizens and reduce traffic accidents and tie-ups.

That would depend on the street and the traffic conditions. Both would be considerations.

Creating ride sharing opportunities and benefits for individuals who carpool and use public transportation. Working with the UofR, one of Rochester’s largest employers and RTA to create a more employee friendly public transportation schedules along with incentives such as reduced bus passes for city residents and Park&Rides for suburban residents.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

We can also reduce the number of school buses by re-instituting neighborhood schools which would reduce traffic congestion and save money.

Mayor Lovely Warren

Candidate Email: Lovely@MayorLovelyWarren.com

Website: MayorLovelyWarren.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

I envision a Rochester that is walkable and bikeable. A city with robust usage of the sharing economy. A city with an accessible public transportation network. I envision a city where single-occupancy car trips are all but unnecessary. And I envision a city that is ahead of the times in preparing its infrastructure for green – and eventually driverless – vehicles. I want our streets to be safe and accessible for not just cars but bikes, pedestrians and public transit, something we are well on the way to accomplishing with our “complete streets” policy.

We are well on our way. As we reinvent our city, we are doing so with the future in mind. Our complete streets policy means that whenever we build or rebuild a road, it must be accessible not just for cars but for pedestrians, bikes and public transit. We are constantly improving our city for cyclists by creating more miles of bike lanes, a bicycle boulevard network, and bicycle safety measures in all corners of our city. We brought ride sharing and bike sharing to Rochester, and are working to raise awareness about the benefits of green vehicles. We created a vanpool program to make it easier for citizens to reach job sites not on the bus line.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

As our city and our economy builds and improves, our transportation options must keep pace. My administration is working actively with RGRTA and our community partners to review our bus routes to make sure they meet the needs of our citizens.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

We must lead the way, and bring all community partners to the table. We must ensure that our transportation network works for everyone, and decrease our dependence on cars.

We created a vanpool program to help our citizens access jobs in areas underserved by public transportation. We are also working with RGRTA to identify these underserved areas, and increase service. Our bike sharing program has improved accessibility for hundreds of residents, as does ride sharing.

The Downtown Transit Center was a crucial step toward this goal, as it made taking the bus easier and sheltered from Rochester’s winters. We are also seeing more residents use ride sharing and bike sharing to get to their destinations. We can encourage bike commuting by continuing to build bike lanes and installing safety measures to protect our citizens.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

We want to be a “park once” city, meaning that residents, workers and visitors only need to park once Downtown, then be able to walk, bike or take public transit to their destinations.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Parking enforcement is necessary to both support businesses, and keep the streets safe for all. No one likes getting a parking ticket, but by enforcing our parking laws, we can ensure a more vibrant and active city.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

We must continue to look at all options.

Yes.

This is something that is already well underway. We have been putting many of our streets on a “road diet”, replacing traffic lanes with bike lanes, street parking, and traffic calming measures. We are exploring a lower speed limit.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

Because we love bikes! (And want to keep our growing number of cyclists safe.)

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

We are building a city that is less reliant on cars, so we must adjust our streetscapes to ensure the safety of our cyclists and pedestrians. Exchange, South and Mount Hope are just three examples of streets that we have improved, with many more to come.

All of the above.

The bike sharing program was a huge step in this direction, as was the Downtown transit center. We will continue to take measures to make Downtown safer for pedestrians and cyclists.

The filling in of the Inner Loop plays an important role in this as well. When complete, the Inner Loop East site will connect our eastern neighborhoods to Downtown, and we hope to do the same with the northern section of the Inner Loop.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

I would just like to thank Reconnect Rochester for all they do in raising awareness, and helping us prepare our city for the next generation.

Alex White

Candidate Email: alexwhiteforrochester@gmail.com

Website: AlexWhiteForRochester.org

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

A comprehensive public transportation system which incorporates bus, light rail and active transportation.

It is important for the city to work with all the elected officials to try to obtain federal funding to start building this comprehensive system. In particular we need to start securing funding to start designing and building an effective light rail system which can provide the backbone for this system.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Rochester, though densely populated is surrounded by a suburban zone which was built to resist public transportation. Further the dispersion of retail has further complicated the development of comprehensive public transportation.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

Due to the way the federal government funds public transportation the city will need to take the lead on any attempt to obtain additional transportation money to help transform our system.

The fact that RGRTA refuses to provide routes to large employers who do not pay for additional coverage is absurd. They to become more flexible with perhaps some smaller vehicles and more specialized routes. If RGRTA can not be changed than the city needs to recover funding and provide the needed services.

Improve public transportation.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

The solution is to increase public transportation and one of the way to do this is to create more attractive transportation options like light rail. This will help decrease the need for parking but in the long run this problem will solve itself as increasing fuel costs will decrease the need for parking.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Though traffic enforcement is important is should be a low priority compared to other public safety issues.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

First it would decrease congestion and parking problems downtown and would help familiarize people with public transit.

Yes.

Decreasing the vehicle speed would help make streets safer for youth in our city and decrease active transportation accidents.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

Bicycling is an ever increasing part of the transportation network and should be encourage when ever possible.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

It is time that we stopped favoring cars in our transportation network and started to put public safety about driver convenience.

I do like providing bike lanes both in the road and adjacent to the sidewalk.

Perhaps the best way to do this is the encourage more employees to live in the city with homeowner incentives and tax credits. Further the health care options can use active transportation incentives to encourage other means of transportation other than cars.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Candidates for City Council:

Pam Davis

Candidate Email: pam4cc@mail.com

Website: www.facebook.com/pg/PamforCityCouncil

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

I would like our network to actually WORK for the residents of the City of Rochester! Currently, the bus system is very time-consuming, and not convenient for riders. More folks would use public transportation if it made logistical sense.

I would like to collaborate with the RTS bus company and a large and varied sample of its regular riders. I would arrange informative brain-storming sessions to help iron out the trouble spots in the current system. Once such sessions have been held, I would like to work on the trouble spots, and find solutions to those challenges. The people who ride the bus each day know where the problems are, and will most likely be able to offer astute suggestions.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

I believe the greatest challenges to Rochester’s transportation stem from the sprawl that was allowed to occur decades ago. The majority of jobs are now located in our county’s suburbs, rather than in the heart of our county, also known as Rochester’s Center City. Because of the very large area that needs to be covered in Monroe County, our public transportation needs are not being met by the current system. The spoke and wheel design is not efficient for the average traveler’s daily needs.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

I see our City government supporting various transportation methods, to build a system that works for the people of the City of Rochester. From carpooling, to rerouting and rescheduling the RTS buses, I believe that the public transportation *could* be a million times better than it is right now. I also know that this will not happen unless the people who actually ride the buses are an integral part of the planning process.

What steps can the City take to improve accessibility to jobs for residents who do not own cars? What steps can the City take to encourage residents who own cars to increase their use of alternative modes of transportation?

I would like the City to take a good look at the many great suggestions that we came up with on the Rochester 4.0 Planning Committees. There were many meetings held across the city, and ours in the NW District touched on public transportation as an area that needed improvement. We also noted the under-use of our city’s waterways. We made the suggestion to create a water taxi service (weather permitting, of course), as well as installing a light-rail system that could make access to and from Charlotte faster (for example), and be able to connect to a bus route, or another trolley line(s), that would serve more areas across our county. These, in partnership with carpool lanes on larger roadways, and offering free parking to carpool vehicles in the city might help reduce our city’s carbon footprint. Carpooling would be a great way to help get city residents to suburban job locations. As a council member, I will also do my best to try to get as many businesses to relocate to our inner city, as this would bring the jobs back to the people who need them the most. I especially want to see Rochester be a leader in the clean energy and renewable resource field, so I want to see manufacturing of solar panels and wind turbines (and their components) to be made in the city by city residents, and placed on city homes to help city homeowners with energy costs. Then, to help finance the whole program/initiative, the city can sell the extra energy generated to other municipalities, and can sell the panels and turbines, as we could be a world leader in this global economy.

I believe that the current bus system is inefficient, and this is a key reason most people do not leave their cars at home. It should not take two hours to go somewhere that is 20 minutes away. We need a better route for buses to travel, as well as increasing the frequency of the bus runs. When I visit NYC, the bus stop showed a schedule and route, and basically the time was listed as, “The bus will be here shortly.”, and it was! I don’t think we waited five minutes. Now, I completely understand that Rochester does not have the same dense population that NYC has, but our residents deserve to have that type of quality service. If you miss a bus after work in the evening, you are going to wait about an hour for the next bus. That is just not feasible for families and students, or for anyone. We need to get where we are going, and not be waiting for a ride everywhere. That is the main reason people drive their cars, rather than take the bus. There should also be ADA compliant public restrooms available across the city, and more bus stops along the routes rather than removing stop locations. There should also be simple shelters and benches available at bus stops. These could be paid for via sponsorships and advertising opportunities. The top 20 people who run the bus company, based upon salary rate, should use their own service. If they aren’t doing so, the question to ask is “Why not?” as the residents of the City of Rochester and the rest of Monroe County deserve to be treated with the same level of respect that they would expect to receive.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

I would like the downtown parking to be free, as the fee to park is prohibitive and unwelcoming to customers of our local businesses. Also, as a part-time worker when I was in college, paying to park a vehicle downtown was a larger percentage of my paycheck than I really could afford to pay. This doesn’t help hard-working people get out of poverty. I would like to see underground parking garages utilized, so that we can conserve our valuable green spaces, while using all space efficiently. I think that garages are better than parking lots, as a lot is taking up an area of space that could be used for social interactions with people, and with small businesses to support our local economy. A garage can be built onto a building, and could also have an ecological component, where solar panels and wind turbines could be mounted onto them, as well as green plants/trees could be grown on the side, to help improve the air quality around the building.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Unfortunately, from my perspective and experience, I believe the City should prioritize traffic enforcement lower on the scale of urgency. The other issues facing the City of Rochester are on a life and death scale, the highest being the insidious drug use epidemic, and the violence that destroys our neighbors’ quality of life. I certainly encourage everyone to follow the current traffic laws, and to be mindful and courteous to others using our roadways. If these road rules were followed, our streets would be safer for all travelers, and our police could be deployed to more serious and timely matters, like getting guns and drugs off our streets and making better community connections between officers and city residents.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

I absolutely support studying these options! If public transportation was faster and convenient, most people would use it willingly, rather than out of necessity. These options could also bring more jobs to our city residents, which would lift more people out of poverty. The environmental benefits of using public transportation more often would also help our overall ecological health.

No.

I do not currently support a “Vision Zero” style approach to road safety, as 25 mph speed limits do not seem reasonable. I believe the current 30 mph limit suits our community. However, as a councilmember, I would ask my constituents what they want, and would support their desire. If a majority of our city residents wanted this “Vision Zero” style, then I would help create legislation to make it become a reality. My own personal opinion would not override the needs of the people I am elected to serve. Other traffic calming practices and policies would be investigated, and again, brought to the people to make the decision, as they would be directly affected by these changes. In some cases, narrowing of roads, or using round-abouts would make perfect sense, and be a benefit to specific areas; in others, not so much. Overall, I encourage educating the public on the current traffic laws and rules, and would expect people to take personal responsibility for their actions. When I rode my bike, I rode with traffic, near the curb, wearing a helmet and reflective clothing with lights on my wheels. I did not pull out into traffic from between two vehicles, or ride on the wrong side of the road. When committing these acts, people are putting their personal safety in jeopardy, as well as creating a hazard for others who are also using the road. Common sense and education is the key to saving lives.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

No.

I feel that there are many streets that are simply too narrow to add a bike lane, and keep the vehicle traffic moving safely. I have seen bike lanes that disappear, and bicyclists be put in danger as cars narrowly miss them. On larger, main thoroughfares, yes, bike lanes make sense, and are a wise investment, such as on Lake Avenue, where the bike lane is up next to the sidewalk, and well out of the way of motorized traffic.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

I do support road changes that are making travel safer for people in our City, but not across the board. I believe we need to act purposefully, and take care not to change something drastically that only needs a minor alteration.

I think the people of Rochester would be the perfect resource and sounding board for this question. From my experience, there are locations where crossing Monroe Avenue, Genesee Street, Lyell Avenue, and East and West Ridge Roads is harrowing, and these should be re-evaluated. In some cases, traffic lights might be the best solution, in others, stop signs. In others still, speed bumps or dips might be the best solution. Some other locations might benefit from a pedestrian island, or from a better timed crossing light. Each location has specific challenges, and a carefully thought out plan will make our city more inviting for all.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

I will lead by example, as I intend to carpool to City Hall with Andrew Hollister (Republican candidate), as he is a neighbor who is also running for a seat on our City Council! For other downtown employees, I would think that offering free parking for carpool vehicles would make a huge difference to many employees in our downtown area. Again, I would like the RTS buses to have more effective and efficient routes, and to run with greater frequency. I would also like shuttle services enlisted, as that might entice more people to use the main forms of transportation, while getting around quickly between established bus locations/different routes. I would also offer enclosed bike parking, and not charge for these spaces. The bike locker I used when I worked downtown was secure, but it should not have cost the rate that it did, as the maintenance of a locker for a bicycle is not commensurate with the amount being charged. There also weren’t enough of them, at the time, and that didn’t encourage people to use that method of transportation as an option.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

As a council member, I will always keep the focus on what is in the best interests of the residents of the City of Rochester. I will encourage the study of different options and new ideas, and not dismiss out of hand any serious proposals to improve citizens’ quality of life.

Shawn Dunwoody

Candidate Email: ShawnDunwoody.com/contact

Website: ShawnDunwoody.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

My vision for Rochester’s transportation network really needs to take a look at transportation design. This would require a neighborhood study to determine the walk, bike, and public transportation patterns in each quadrant. For example, some areas of our city biking is used as a major means of transportation and delivery. I have seen and have been part of moving large objects about town using shopping carts, balancing beams on the handle bars, and ghost riding another bike while pulling a trash toter or lawnmower. Let’s observe our streets. Talk to those we see riding and walking in our neighborhoods and ask what/how do you use transportation? What would help you to better achieve your day-to-day goals using Rochester’s transportation network? With these questions, we can help to build a network that fits and grows with its community.

I will work with our City Planners, Urban design Centers, area colleges to assist in mobilizing the community members in developing ride, bike, and walking charrettes.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

Well, how about supporting entrepreneurs and local businesses along transportation routes and the smaller (at first) neighborhood businesses that can hire small numbers from the area within walking distance.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Malik Evans

Candidate Email: Malik@malikevans.org

Website: www.MalikEvans.org

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

A network that includes buses, bikes, ride sharing that breaks down barriers so that everyone in the community can have the opportunity for prosperity.

Regularly working with like minded community organizations like reconnect Rochester and ensuring that our public transportation system is responsive and innovative. I will also advocate policies that encourage whenever possible that pedestrian zones get the highest priority.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Buses that don’t route to where jobs often are in the far flung suburbs. This is a challenge for poor working families.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

The city has the ability to advocate and push for pedestrian friendly policies and advocate for things like car sharing, bike sharing and zoning policies that put an emphasis on pedestrian friendly streets.

Van pooling and working to attract jobs that are in neighborhoods, so people can walk when possible. We also need to ensure public transit is accessible to everyone.

We need more public awareness about the benefits. We also need to make it fun in encouraging different modes of ransportation.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

Broadly we need to make it possible for people not to have to drive and park downtown. We need more options for a shuttle that travels downtown from areas where people can leave there car. The long term solution is a more robust transit system that can provide timely service to all areas.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Traffic enforcement should be a major priority.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

This will cut down on downtown congestion, parking in particular. This will also encourage exploring downtown and can attract new businesses.

Yes.

This will make Rochester more pedestrian friendly.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

Bikes are a great form of transportation and promotes good health.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

This will help pedestrians.

East Main St., North Goodman, West Main St.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

Rewards for using other forms of transportation.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Mitch Gruber

Candidate Email: MitchForCityCouncil@gmail.com

Website: MitchGruber.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

I envision a #HealthyRochester, where kids can play actively, families can eat healthy, and anyone can get from here to there with diverse transportation options. We must have active, affordable, and convenient transportation options.

I will push for an Active Transportation Council/Committee, with representatives from many key local organizations: Reconnect Rochester, Conkey Cruisers, Rochester Cycling Alliance, HealthiKids, and more. This political body will liaise with City Council to develop effective legislation to improve our transportation system. In addition, I would recommend that the City hires someone dedicated to active transportation.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

I see two main challenges. First, our main transportation system (RGRTA) is controlled by the County, and they do not spend adequate resources in the City. Second, Rochester is neither a particularly bikeable or walkable city. We need to make some significant improvements in our bicycling infrastructure, and increase the walkability of our streets.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

Addressing the above challenges will require two different strategies. First, we must begin to elect officials that can bridge the relationship between City and County. RGRTA will continue to be run by the County for the foreseeable future, but we can continue to improve the working relationship between RGRTA and the people of Rochester that depend on public transit. Second, we can begin to build the right infrastructure in City Hall to improve our transportation infrastructure. I would start by advocating for a full-time active transportation specialist in City Hall, and an Active Transportation Committee/Council.

My website (mitchgruber.com) includes a lot of information about Middle Skills job training. I believe that we have available jobs in our community, but we must be able to train people for those jobs. As part of that process, we must ensure that major employers are on the RGRTA bus line and encourage biking to work. We have done this at Foodlink, where many employees do not own cars. In addition, when possible employers should provide bus passes to workers instead of parking passes.

This city is clearly interested in biking, as evidenced by the apparent success of Zagster in the last month. We must invest in better biking infrastructure (bike lanes and blvds). I’d like to create a bike “highway” like in bike-friendly cities like Portland and Minneapolis. In addition, we must continue to work with RGRTA to make this a more viable form of transportation for people with cars by creating new, strategic routes.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

We need to stop investing in surface-level parking, and encourage the use of public/active transportation. Beyond that, I strongly believe that we need to have data and strategy to create a vision for parking downtown. That’s why I would use my voice as a councilmember to encourage the hiring of a full-time active transportation specialist and the creation of an Active Transportation Committee/Council.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

There needs to be a strategy when it comes to traffic enforcement. Currently, it feels like different authorities prioritize traffic enforcement in very different ways. We need to make sure that as a City and County, we understand the purpose and goals of traffic enforcement. Again, this is an opportunity for a Transportation Committee/Council.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

These are innovative solutions that must be addressed by City Hall.

Yes.

I support data-driven approaches that show evidence of creating safer roads and more sustainable transportation usages. I would want any legislation about transportation in Rochester to be data-driven and evidence-based.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

This is a critical form of transportation, and we need to do a lot of work to improve our bikability. I think this issue is significant in low-income communities, like where I live. Many people use bicycles to get to work and otherwise, but there are insufficient lanes in these communities.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

We need innovative, data-driven approaches to transportation planning.

I don’t have one particular version of the road diet that I am interested in, because I am not an active transportation specialist. I would listen to transportation specialists, and encourage the creation of a Committee/Council to help develop this type of legislation.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

Improving commuter bus routes and bike lanes, and incentivizing the use of public/active transportation. This shouldn’t be difficult with City employees, since parking near City Hall is incredibly difficult.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

I don’t have all the answers to these questions, because I am not a transportation specialist. However, I will be the type of legislators that Reconnect Rochester wants. I have a track record of innovation at Foodlink, and I am data-driven as evidenced by my PhD in urban history. Most importantly, I know how to ask the right questions of the right people; that is why most of my answers alluded to the creation of an Active Transportation Committee/Council, which would include representation from Reconnect Rochester.

Dorian L. Hall

Candidate Email: Dorian@dorianleanderhall.com

Website: www.DorianLeanderHall.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

I have always like railways. i would like to see a rail system.

I think we should look at transportation in international city’s as they seem to have more experience.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Having people willing to think out of the box and do something different.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

I think Rochester is tied to RTS and will not makes changes because of thier financial interest.

The City can focus on added manufacturing business to neighborhoods which help them become walk able neighborhoods.

The city should create a rail system where people feel safe and spend less time in than if they had to drive a car.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

I think they should make parcel 5 green space .

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

I think city should focus on issues or intersection communities say are not safe because of accidents.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

An order to stop my from driving we need other transportation than bus, taxi, lift, and uber.

Yes.

I have seen speed bumps work in my neighborhood.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

No.

I have seen people almost hit by cars.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

If its for safety and saves lives it makes sense. Speed bumps seem to work well.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

I would gives Bus tokens to employees.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Safety and kids at play enriches a kids life.

Ronald Hall

Candidate Email: www.facebook.com/ronald.hall.1213

Website: www.facebook.com/ronald.hall.1213

Unfortunately we did not receive a response from Ronald Hall.

Tom Hasman

Candidate Email: Tom.Hasman@gmail.com

Website: TomHasman.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

Rochester needs to adapt our transportation network to meet the needs of its citizens. Many millennials are embracing public transportation over cars. Empty nesters moving into the city are also looking for transportation options that do not involve cars. Buses are the principal public transit method for many city residents and will remain that way for the foreseeable future. However, Rochester should consider bringing back street cars as another public transportation method. Bus lines can be started and stopped at will and thus can be a barrier to development. Having dedicated tracks serve a neighborhood shows a permanent commitment to that neighborhood and increases the chances that development will take place. Look no further than Washington, DC for a real example of how “dedicated tracks” can spur development. The DC metro system has spurred growth near each metro stop. They are also historical and can add to the visual landscape of Rochester. We also need to continue adding bike lanes to our streets, and maintain the bike sharing program.

The city could not solely fund a street car line. We would need help from the state and federal government. Buffalo received funding to build their metro system so there is no reason why Rochester could not receive state and federal funds to build a street car network. As for the bike lanes, I would work with city planners and group such as Reconnect Rochester to ensure that we choose the right streets to make dedicated bike lanes.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Rochester’s greatest challenge is our sheer size. It can be difficult to get from one side of the city to the other without a car. Our bus system is also not particularly well-designed to move people around the city. It is also hard to convince people to give up their car, especially when they are limited public alternatives.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

City Council and the mayor’s office must reach out to the community to see what the residents are looking for in a transportation system. The city should also consult stakeholder groups such as Reconnect Rochester. Based on this input, a transportation plan should be created and carried out.

The new bike-sharing program is great. It would be great to see this program expanded beyond where they are currently located. We have a bus system that is not effective at moving people around the city. Me must make RTS buses more usable for city residents.

We need bus routes that make sense. For instance, my wife happily took the 52 bus from our neighborhood to her place of work (Strong Memorial Hospital). This bus route was abandoned after less than a year. The City can also incentivize more ride-sharing. Lastly, the City can continue to create more and safer bicycle routes.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

Research has shown that as much as 30% of downtown traffic in some cities can be attributed to people looking for cheaper street parking. To combat this, some cities have implemented Right-pricing parking. According to Donald Shoup: “The right prices are the lowest prices that will leave one or two open spaces on each block, so there will be no parking shortages. Prices will balance the demand and supply for on-street parking spaces.” The city could also implement a “downtown circulator” to move people around downtown while alleviating the need for parking. Long term, creating a street car line that also serves downtown Rochester could encourage people to leave their car at home and take public transit instead.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

This is a tough question to answer (nice job!). While the easy answer is “of course we should prioritize traffic enforcement,” I understand that it is not that simple. The police force is stretched thin. When I was President of the ABC Streets Neighborhood, I worked with the police department to increase enforcement of the stop sign at Park and Colby (many cars weren’t stopping for the 4-way stop sign). The police increased the patrols and did what they could, but the reality is that they often had more pressing issues to handle and couldn’t be there was much as the neighborhood wanted. The city should look into creating a traffic enforcement division that could be a “wing” of the police department and have them focus on traffic enforcement.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

I think these are all great ideas. New Orleans and San Francisco utilize street cars/cable cars. These are not only practical ways of public transit but they also add to the downtown landscape. Rochester needs think “beyond the bus” for other methods of public transit that could work with a bus system.

Yes.

As the father of two young children, I cannot emphasize enough the need to lower the city speed-limit. On my street, which has a large number of children and dogs, it is discouraging to watch cars speed down our street. Speed bumps were added a few years ago and that has helped somewhat, but 30 mph is still too fast for our residential streets.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

It would encourage more residents to use their bicycles and also make bike riding safer by giving bicyclists their own dedicated lane to ride in.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

It is a common sense approach that doesn’t cost much money to implement and helps reduce accidents and save lives.

There was a lot of complaining when East Ave was reduced to two lanes (from four) several years ago but traffic runs smoothly and there is now room for bikes and dedicated left hand turn lanes for cars. I would like to see more of this type of change on other thoroughfare streets in the city where feasible.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

Again, my wife lives and works in the city. Her bus route was dismantled less than a year after it began. The bus was packed during the AM and PM commutes but was mostly empty during the other times. Many residents who took the bus asked RTS to make the 52 bus a “commuter bus” providing service only during rush hour times but RTS refused and discontinued the route. We need much smarter bus routes for residents who also work in the city. We also need to work with employers to further incentivize ride-sharing.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

For my final comment, I would like to address driverless cars. This is not abstract idea. Some carmakers — Ford, GM, Honda, Nissan, Volvo, Toyota are all predicting fully driverless cars by 2020-2021. I would like Rochester to be a leader in this area. We need to begin to envision how our cities will change with this new technology, we must imagine and foster this new landscape.

Andrew Hollister

Candidate Email: Hollister4Council.com/#contact

Website: www.Hollister4Council.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

It’s tragic that a lack of affordable transportation options make it difficult for so many Rochesterians to find or keep a job. We’re a city where personal vehicle ownership has become essential for career success. Many voters have shared with me that our bus network fails to meet the needs of everyday commuters. But it does not have to be that way. By implementing new technology, our bus system can get the user data, route responsiveness, and convenience that modern consumers demand. We must embrace a plethora of affordable transportation options from bicycle networks to innovative ride sharing technology on a mass transit scale

We need to start with reforming our archaic city code in a number of areas to foster transportation innovation, smart development, and business growth. First, we must remove barriers to innovation that prevent transportation entrepreneurs from expanding and experimenting with ride sharing technology on a larger scale. City council must encourage RTS to embrace this technology as well and use the data collected to improve routes and meet consumer needs. Second, we can reform our zoning laws to allow for more mixed use development in neighborhoods. This will encourage the growth of office space, restaurants, retail, and other business opportunities in walkable settings. Third, removing burdensome requirements will encourage businesses to take advantage of mixed use development opportunities in the city, further incentivizing people to use alternative transportation options to access goods and services in their neighborhood.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Decades of transportation policy at the federal, state, and local level have made owning a car essential for economic opportunity. We’ve invested billions in infrastructure that ensures this mode of transit. It will take a very long time to change that. In addition to this, public transportation has often been viewed as a service strictly for poor people (I hear this constantly). Public transportation must be built, viewed, and developed as a viable alternative to automobile transportation by people of all walks of life. It needs to be built with the goal of bringing people to and from work.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

Removing barriers to transportation innovation in the private sector will allow entrepreneurs to create unique and inexpensive options for everyone, including low-income residents. In the long term, working with city planners to create a infrastructure policy that encourages multiple modes of transportation will be essential for an equitable transportation network in the future.

Allowing for mixed used development and removing barriers to job growth will create jobs right in our Rochester neighborhoods where they will be in walking distance from their jobs. Think of the neighborhoods that this is already possible. Very successful areas such as East Ave, Park Ave, Monroe, Alexander. All of these are zoned for mixed use and they allow for people in the neighborhoods to also work in the neighborhoods. The areas of the city that are Zoned R1 (most strictly) don’t allow for jobs to come into the neighborhoods. Instead you need to rely on transportation out of your neighborhood to find a job. City Council can and should revise our zoning so that it doesn’t prevent jobs from coming into our neighborhoods.

City residents will use alternative modes of transportation when it’s available, useful, and affordable. Although many people are willing to take the extra steps of biking, walking, or using mass transit for moral or environmental reasons, most people will continue to use personal vehicles as long as it’s convenient and makes financial sense. Big changes to transportation behavior require cultural and technical changes. By making the changes to mass transit approach, regulations, and city code recommended above, there will be situations where city residents are more likely to have access to alternative transportation options in their neighborhoods and throughout the city. There will be more situations where it will make more sense to walk, bike, or use a service than to take a personal vehicle.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

There has been a very diverse outlook on parking downtown. Some people (especially business owners) feel as if there isn’t enough parking for their customers, or parking that is convenient enough. While others believe there is an abundance of parking and that there should be less of it. Downtown is already extremely crowded when it comes to development. Adding more parking lots and parking areas isn’t feasible without more development and a significant cost to the Rochester community.

As I think about this issue I think both sides need to be considered for a solution. How do you provide the convenience of driving and owning your own vehicle while thinning out traffic and dense parking? Although the easy answer is we should have better public transportation so people don’t need to rely on their vehicles for convenience I don’t foresee that as an overnight or immediately available change. I do believe there is an opportunity for the private sector to create a park and ride option outside of downtown that provides ample parking services and shuttles you downtown to where you want to be, or to a zagster spot. Businesses can offer vouchers to their customers to cover the parking and they can maintain the convenience. If done right you could pay the same as you do for downtown parking without actually needing to find a spot while maintaining the convenience.

Another option would be to leverage technology and build an app that will track open parking spots, so that people can quickly find the closest available parking spot. Other cities have done this successfully. We need to be more innovative with our city government so we aren’t continuously behind the times.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Aggressive traffic enforcement does not necessarily solve safety problems for the people of Rochester. We some traffic enforcement for a few reckless individuals, but it’s often used to generate revenue and it can lead to unnecessary conflicts between police and citizens. Traffic safety could be improved with better design. By designing our streets to slow down cars, respect cyclists, and draw attention to pedestrians, we’ll improve safety outcomes without needing to resort to ineffective punitive measures.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

No.

Building a mass transit network that is financially sustainable is incredibly difficult. When building a fixed route streetcar system, getting it right is critical. Studies aren’t conclusive but we can look to market behavior as our guide. City Council should reduce regulatory barriers to allow the private sector innovative rapid transition options in Rochester (think Uber, Lyft, and Zagster all of these are private sector solutions to problems that local government have failed to solve). These solutions may fill the need for mass transit solutions or demonstrate the need for public investment in costlier transit infrastructure in popular travel corridors.

Yes.

As mentioned in the answer on traffic enforcement, structural changes to our streets play a critical role in improving safety for our citizens.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

As someone who grew up riding my bike on the streets of Rochester and using my bike as a commuter, I know how important bike infrastructure is. My bike was my first mode of transportation to my first job, and I was hit by cars not once but twice while riding my bike. There’s a growing trend of people cycling in Rochester for commuting and recreation. The city should continue looking for affordable options to improve bicycle safety through defined lanes, protected lanes, and measures to encourage safe road sharing with vehicles.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

Every time a cyclist or pedestrian is injured or even killed by a driver, it’s heartbreaking. As I mentioned, I’ve been struck while riding my bike too. Many of these accidents are preventable. Our streets must be built for an urban environment where people live, work, walk, and play. Streets designed to slow drivers down and invite them to recognize potential conflicts will do far more to improve safety and livability in Rochester than traffic enforcement on roads that invite drivers to speed and drive recklessly. That’s why I would support road diets and changes to road configurations for select problem areas in the city.

There are so many busy streets to name off it would probably be easier to name the streets that don’t need it. Lake Ave and Main street are some of the first that come to mind, but there are so many more in every neighborhood in our city. Many of these streets are busy and dangerous for pedestrians simply do not have any space at all to be on the street with a bicycle.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

I’m not a fan of handing out taxpayer dollars as incentives. I’d much rather use them on our residents and neighborhoods. If we remove any subsidies for parking and allow prices to reflect the actual cost of maintaining parking lots we will see people do this on their own. They will look to carpooling and ask for better transportation options themselves. They may even collaborate and come up with an amazing idea that hasn’t been thought of yet as a solution.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Our government is constantly looking to reinvent the wheel with our public transportation. I have visited cities that we never once used a car in. We were able to get from one end of the city to another conveniently at very little cost in the same amount of time that we would have in a car. We must look to those cities and their infrastructure instead of trying to make new solutions that do not work. We’ve done that time and time again. It is consistently failing. Sometimes it is better to acknowledge that the solution has already been found and adopt it. An example of this is our downtown transit center. We spent a lot of money, lost service areas, and don’t have better transportation, why did our local government choose this over a model that has been proven to work in cities our size?

Matt Juda

Candidate Email: Matt@mattjuda.com

Website: www.MattJuda.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

I would like to see Rochester’s transportation network include more alternatives to single occupant vehicles, while empowering and protecting cyclists and pedestrians.

While ride sharing services like Lyft and Uber are helpful in reducing the number of vehicles on the road, increased investment in bicycle infrastructure would further reduce automobile reliance. As a member of City Council I would push to continue expanding the number of bicycle rental kiosks and make sure they are distributed evenly among all our cities neighborhoods. I would also asses areas where speed humps, stop signs, and other traffic control devices could be deployed to increase compliance with speed limits.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Rochester’s greatest transportation challenge is overcoming a highway system that was built to accommodate America’s reliance on automobiles. Filling in the Inner Loop was a vital first step towards reconnecting our neighborhoods and increasing pedestrian mobility throughout the East End/Down corridor which is vital to the economic success of our city. Prioritizing people over automobiles is the key to revitalizing our City and overcoming the legacy transportation system designed specifically for automobiles.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

Advocacy and providing some funding for programs that increase access to alternate forms of transportation.

As a routine part of the City’s economic development efforts, businesses which seek tax credits and other financing assistance should be required to either demonstrate their location is accessible by existing public transportation options, or contribute to the cost of expanding public transportation. This would incentivize density, while preventing urban sprawl, and make jobs more accessible to city residents.

Increasing the number of bike rental kiosks is a great way to encourage people to move around without relying on vehicles. Similarly, partnering with local business to provide coupons and gift cards as incentives for residents to ride buses several times a month would both reduce traffic congestion and emissions, but it would also provide publicity for new businesses. Most importantly, incentivizing ridership on existing public transportations options increases familiarity and helps eliminate the psychological barrier of trying something new for the first time.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

My broad vision for improving the traffic situation downtown is to facilitate policies and planning decisions that ultimately reduce the total number of cars downtown at any given time. We should not be trying to make parking easier and encouraging vehicle dependence, we should be creating a more robust and holistic public transportation system that allows people to get where they want to be without taking a car.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

While traffic enforcement is critical to improving the safety of our families, pedestrians and bicyclists, I believe that the question of prioritization of enforcement is best left to the career professionals of the Rochester Police Department. I do however believe that by having one week every several months were RPD officers aggressively monitor traffic violations would go a long way towards changing motorist’s driving behaviors, especially in residential neighborhoods

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

Reducing the number of vehicles that are on city streets would make walkers and bikers more comfortable sharing the road and sidewalks. I support a feasibility study for transportation alternatives as a way to jump start the potential virtuous cycle that could result from the use of street cars, circulators, etc.

Yes.

Yes. I support a 25mph speed limit and the implementation of traffic calming practices because we need to ensure that pedestrians and cyclists feel safe sharing the road. By making roads narrower and building protected bike lanes, we can both protect our residents who already ride bicycles and encourage new riders to leave their car at home.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

The bicycle lanes provide a safer space for the use of bicycles to transit around our city. I believe we should work to provide more lanes like those alone lake ave in Charlotte where there is a path next to the sidewalk.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

The road diet or change in road ways will greatly increase the safety for all commuters.

Lake Ave, Main Street near culver, West Main Street, reconfigure Mt. Hope at Elmwood

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

Incentivize carpool through preferred parking and reduced rates. Stipend for alternate vehicles. Bus passes for commuters or reduced rate.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Ann Lewis

Candidate Email: www.facebook.com/ann.c.lewis.12

Website: www.facebook.com/ann.c.lewis.12

Unfortunately we did not receive a response from Ann Lewis.

Willie Joe Lightfoot

Candidate Email: WillieLightfoot4CityCouncil@gmail.com

Website: www.WillieLightfoot.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

My vision for Rochester’s transportation network is that every citizen will have adequate access to affordable transportation.

I plan to achieve this by working within my governmental capacities to work with our Federal , State, County and local leaders to make this a reality.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Making sure transportation is convenient and affordable.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

I feel City government plays a major role in leading the way to helping to assure adequate transportation for all citizens such as recent roll that City played in Zagster bikes.

I like the ride sharing program that the Mayor started with casino. I think more ride sharing programs can work in our community.

Encourage ride sharing.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

I think we have to look at how other cities our size are dealing with this situation and implement ideas that work.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

Look at whats working in other Cities our size.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

No.

I support surveying the community as to what the community wants to study so we don’t spend unnecessary public dollars on studies.

Yes.

For public safety I think it a good idea.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

I like whats been done on Jefferson , Thurston, Ford street.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

Maybe some types of incentives would work?

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

Mary Lupien

Candidate Email: mlupien@gmail.com

Website: MaryLupien.com

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

My vision for Rochester’s transportation network is a system that is so accessible, user friendly, and intuitive that everybody uses it, not just those who don’t have other options. I also dream of a transportation system that creates equity of access for those same people without options so that they don’t spend hours away from their homes and children just to get to a job that barely pays the bills. I dream of a transportation system that is uplifting and brings people together, something that we can take pride in.

I plan to achieve this vision for Rochester by working with RTS and organizations like Reconnect Rochester as a city councilperson to re-imagine our transportation system and develop proposals that fit our city and our needs. We can also use van pools to save money where it makes sense and work to appoint people to the transit authority that are invested in and passionate about public transportation so that more dollars can be directed towards these projects.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?
What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

Rochester’s greatest obstacles are budget, system design, lack of transit oriented design and lack of comprehensive walking and biking infrastructure. Our transportation system also has an image problem where there is a negative connotation around using public transportation because it has been inefficient, hard to use, and poorly maintained for so long. Branding can go a long way in encouraging millennials and folks who have cars to use public transit and feel a greater sense of social responsibility in their transportation choices.

I think it is important for members of city government to actively advocate for improvements in our transportation network and not just wait for proposals to come across their desks. I will be a strong voice for transportation on city council as a climate and social justice activist and will work to educate my peers and other city leaders on the exponential benefits to a community like ours of having a robust and equitable network. Whether it is reducing segregation, lifting people out of poverty, taking care of the environment, or contributing to overall quality of life, there is something almost anyone can relate to and get behind in the list of benefits of a healthy, accessible public transportation system.

Aside from expanding and improving access to public transportation, the city can incentivize businesses to build and develop along transportation routes that already exist. The new Zagster system is a great way of improving accessibility because the bikes can be locked at any bike rack, and I would like to see that program expanded. I would be thrilled to see the use of cooperative ride share and car sharing ventures.

First, it has to be accessible and intuitive enough for it to make sense to use for people who have busy schedules and limited capital in the areas of time and energy. Second, by rebranding our busses and running public advertising campaigns about the social and environmental benefits of using public transportation we can attract and capitalize on the desire for and understanding of public transportation that is already there in our community. I believe there are lots of people in Rochester who want to use public transportation and believe in the benefits for whom it is not yet a viable option. If we can give them a system that makes sense to use and fits into their lives, I believe they will make an effort to take advantage.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

By improving our transportation system and increasing multi-modal transportation options, we can reduce the number of cars descending on downtown. I’d also like to see more park and rides in the suburbs with regular service so that it is convenient for people to leave their cars and take public transportation downtown. I do not support building more parking garages.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

I believe that consistency in traffic enforcement is important – it affects people’s lives – but we can also reduce the need for enforcement by enacting traffic calming measures that free up human resources and energy, creating less conflict between citizens and police and sustaining a system that manages itself.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

These strategies have worked in other cities and are effective in bringing people together and connecting high traffic areas while increasing economic development, quality of life, and improving access to our most valuable assets.

Yes.

I agree with the Vision Zero initiative in that “no loss of life is acceptable” and that we can design our streets and city to be so safe and friendly to walkers and bikers that severe injuries and fatalities can be a thing of the past. Whether it is speed limits, speed bumps, road dieting, road painting projects, roundabouts, or protected bike lanes, there are so many thoughtful and strategic ways to plan our city for safety and we can learn a lot from other cities who have taken the lead on these initiatives.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

A bicycle lane network doesn’t just benefit the people who are already using bikes instead of cars, it will encourage people to bike and do so even more while reducing the negative effects of cars on the environment and getting people out of their cars and into their communities, interacting with and lifting the spirit of the town. There are definitely folks in the community who would bike to work if it was reliably safer to do so.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

The safety of our roads for everyone, especially pedestrians and bikers, is extremely valuable and we will reap the benefits for generations.

Main Street, Lake Avenue.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

The city can incentivize public transportation for its employees by providing bus or Zagster passes to city workers who live in areas where transportation is already accessible.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

I think Reconnect Rochester is doing an incredible job of championing these changes and strategies and educating the public on why this matters and I look forward to working with them and elevating their voices and ideas in our city conversations.

Dana K. Miller

Candidate Email: Dana@DanaMillerForCouncil.com

Website: www.facebook.com/dkmiller26

What is your vision for Rochester’s transportation network? How do you plan to achieve that vision?

Series of transportation options that includes walking, biking, ride-sharing, public transit and private vehicles. Available at all times to all people.

Have supported legislation to introduce uber/lyft, reduce regulations on taxis, increase bike lanes, improve public transit, introduce bike sharing.

What are Rochester’s greatest challenges in regards to transportation?

Transportation options for people with disabilities, transportation at all hours, transportation at all destinations.

What role do you see City government playing in building a more robust and equitable transportation network?

We are responsible for bike lanes, street construction, oversight for public transit.

We have implemented van pools, and supported ride-sharing/bike sharing. I will continue to lobby RGRTA to provide more off-hours service to non-city work destinations.

We can right-size parking, and possibly offer incentives (financial, or other) to residents who alter their transportation methods.

Broadly, what is your vision for improving the parking situation downtown?

We have more spaces now than are needed, but not in the right places. I will advocate for a circulator (bus/trolley) that can move people as required. We must be careful not to overbuild parking as options to private vehicles increase.

How do you think the City should prioritize traffic enforcement relative to other issues?

I would like to see traffic enforcement given higher prioriy.

Do you support studying the feasibility of modern streetcars, downtown circulators, and various rapid transit options for Rochester? Why or why not?

Yes.

Circulator, and streetcar optons could help resolve the parking concerns.

Yes.

A Vision Zero approach could help improve road safety and help eliminate deaths due to road design problems.

Do you support the continued expansion of a bicycle lane network throughout the City? Why or why not?

Yes.

Bicycles are among the most democratic transportation options. They don’t require a license, insurance or inspections. I will continue to advocate for bike based transportation options.

Do you support road diets or significant changes to road configurations to improve safety on any major roadways in the City? Why or why not? If yes, which ones?

Yes.

Lane reduction measures such as bumpouts, roundabouts, and bike lanes have proven to increase traffic, bike, and pedestrian safety.

We are currently working on Main St, and I would like to see more work done on Lake Ave, Mt. Hope and Mt. Read.

What steps do you think we can take to encourage employees (especially City employees) to commute using transportation options other than single occupant automobiles (walk/bike/bus/carpool/etc.)?

We can look at providing subsidies or other economic support to employees who decide to commute using alternative methods.

Are there any other comments or thoughts you’d like to share?

We need to reduce the “stigma” of non-car transportation options. Our city, like most, is car centric and anyone not using a car is seen as “less than”.

Jackie Ortiz

Candidate Email: OrtizForCouncil@gmail.com

Website: OrtizForCityCouncil.com

Unfortunately we did not receive a response from Jackie Ortiz.

Loretta Scott

Candidate Email: Loretta.Scott@cityofrochester.gov

Website: www.facebook.com/CouncilmemberLorettaScott

Unfortunately we did not receive a response from Loretta Scott.

Marcus Williams

Website: www.Marcus4Rochester.com

Unfortunately we did not receive a response from Marcus Williams.

Reconnect Rochester would like to thank all of the candidates (and their teams) for the time and effort they’ve dedicated to our community, and for taking the time to answer our questions. We look forward to working with them very soon.

Cast Your Vote (just for funsies):

[democracy id=”2″]

[democracy id=”3″]

April 7, 2017 No Comments

Understanding “Car Culture”

For Rochester Street Films this year we asked local filmmakers and ordinary citizens to share their perspective on what it’s like to get around Rochester without a car. No rules; No restrictions; No filter.

Alex Freeman has previously made several films about local cyclists. With this project Alex attempts to understand why the automobile has had such a grip on the hearts and minds of Rochester commuters – and if there’s any room for understanding…

We’d like to ask for your help getting these films in front of as many people as we can. If you would like to host a mini screening of Rochester Street Films in your neighborhood, please contact us.

March 30, 2017 No Comments

Getting Around with a Disability

Ericka Jones, a Systems Advocate at Center for Disability Rights, focuses on a segment of our population often overlooked. For people with disabilities, Ericka shows us how running a simple errand requires careful planning days in advance. Ironically, even the streets themselves can become barriers to living a productive life…

We’d like to ask for your help getting these films in front of as many people as we can. If you would like to host a mini screening of Rochester Street Films in your neighborhood, please contact us.

March 30, 2017 No Comments

Rochester Street Films 2017

We are all very busy. Our days are filled with places we need to go, people we need to see, things we need to do. Almost like a movie, we bounce between different scenes of our daily lives. But unlike a movie, we can’t simply edit out all of the time in between those scenes. We don’t think much about our time in transit. But the way we use that time may say a lot about who we are.

Are you the type of person who takes time to enjoy the journey? Or is the journey something you’d rather fast forward through?

What if you could bring a film crew with you on your commute to work? What if a camera man followed you on a trip to the grocery store, or to pick up your kids at school? What might we learn by watching that movie? Would it be something you’d want to share with your friends on Facebook? Or would it make better material for an upsetting Michael Moore documentary?

That was the idea behind the latest installment of Rochester Street Films. We asked local filmmakers and ordinary citizens to share their perspective on what it’s like to get around Rochester without a car. No rules; No restrictions; No filter.

Last night 200+ people gathered at The Little Theatre for the kickoff of Rochester Street Films 2017 season. Over the next few weeks we’ll share those films with you here.

And we’d like to ask for your help getting these films in front of as many people as we can. If you would like to host a mini screening of Rochester Street Films in your neighborhood, please contact us.

February 19, 2017 5 Comments

Maybe Not So Uber for Everyone

Guest essay submitted by: Ericka Jones, Systems Advocate at Center for Disability Rights…

Imagine you found out Uber was coming to your town. The typical response is to be really excited and relieved that a lower cost and convenient ride service was coming to your area. You no longer have to deal with the stress of how you will get to work on time or if a ride is even available!

December 22, 2016 3 Comments

Transportation and Poverty (Part 6): What Should Be Done?

Posted by: Pete Nabozny, Associate Principal at CGR and co-owner of Tru Yoga

As we’ve seen previously in this series of posts on Transportation & Poverty, the costs associated with transportation for Rochesterians in poverty are considerable. Low-income workers are faced with a difficult choice – spend a high portion of their income on a car and associated expenses so that they can get to work in a reasonable amount of time or lose many hours each week commuting by public transportation, effectively reducing their hourly pay and crowding out other productive activities. The ongoing de-concentration of jobs and housing in our region only exacerbates this dilemma. Read more

December 21, 2016 3 Comments

Transportation and Poverty (Part 5): The Problem with Sprawl

Posted by: Pete Nabozny, Associate Principal at CGR and co-owner of Tru Yoga

So far, we’ve examined how long commute times limit the ability of low-income workers who live in high poverty areas in the City to reach jobs through public transportation. We have also explored how the cost of car ownership is often prohibitively expensive for these same individuals. This post will assess how the continuing sprawl of our region has a particularly negative impact on low-income residents. Read more

December 19, 2016 7 Comments

Transportation and Poverty Series (Part 4): The Cost of Car Ownership

Posted by: Pete Nabozny, Associate Principal at CGR and co-owner of Tru Yoga

Last time, we explored the problem of the long commute in Rochester and its impact on the effective wage of low income workers. Obviously, we are not the first to point this problem out. You might logically conclude, like many well-meaning organizations have, that we must provide a program or mechanism through which low-income folks can receive or buy a reasonably priced car. After all, that is the mode of transit for an overwhelming majority of our region’s residents and studies have suggested that access to a vehicle is correlated with more hours worked and more wages earned. A chicken in every pot and a car in every backyard, right President Hoover? The cherry on top is that our region famously has some of the shortest driving commutes in the nation. Read more

December 16, 2016 4 Comments

Transportation and Poverty (Part 3): The Long Bus Commute and the Value of Time

Posted by: Pete Nabozny, Associate Principal at CGR and co-owner of Tru Yoga

Here in Rochester, most middle class households own a car or two and think nothing of driving to their place of employment. For these individuals, public transportation needs to be a competitive alternative to driving for them to ditch their cars. If a bus stops near a person’s home frequently and reliably, and drops that person off near their place of work within 10 minutes or so of what it would take them to drive, they may opt to commute by bus. Read more

December 14, 2016 No Comments

Transportation and Poverty (Part 2): What is Poverty?

Posted by: Pete Nabozny, Associate Principal at CGR and co-owner of Tru Yoga

Over the next two weeks, Reconnect Rochester is going to publish a series of pieces that explore the issue of poverty in our region. These articles will focus primarily on the intersection of poverty with public transportation, sprawl, and community planning. But before we start, it is important to have a firm understanding of what the problem is and why it is so pernicious in our region. Read more

December 12, 2016 No Comments

Introduction to Transportation and Poverty in the Rochester Region

Posted by: Pete Nabozny, Associate Principal at CGR and co-owner of Tru Yoga

The statistics are overwhelming – 111,000 Monroe County residents live in poverty, accounting for slightly more than 15% of the region’s total population. Within the City of Rochester, a full 34% of the City’s population (or over 68,000 people) live below the poverty line, including over 50% of children in the City. The percentage of City residents in poverty has risen by 30% since 1990, when less than 24% of City residents were impoverished. Read more

Whose Job Is It Anyway?

How Does It Work In Other U.S. Cities?

Our Neighbors To The Northeast

Calming The Storm

The “Pay To Play” cost of the automobile might be the most racially exclusive component of American society.

“The financial burden that the car-centric American narrative places on our families is stifling. … Those who can purchase and maintain a car win…everyone else loses.“

“Want to make the United States more equitable? Support public transit that serves everyone.”

A few related notes and resources from Reconnect Rochester. . .

It’s Not Our Fault

Rochester’s Ridership Was Remarkable

Bike Share Theft Happens Everywhere

We Will Have Bike Share Again

This Is Not Another Fast Ferry

“The pandemic is giving humankind a unique opportunity to see — firsthand — what our lives look like when motor traffic is significantly reduced.“

“Substantially reduced particle pollution is good for everybody — and especially good for those with the most urgent health needs.“

“A one-year, 8% drop [in greenhouse gas emissions] isn’t enough to solve the world’s climate change problem, but it’s a step in the right direction.“

“As social distancing eases and we venture out of our homes more often, what if we do it without so much motor traffic?”

We can get started right now.

Help Us Keep the Momentum Going in 2020!

Reconnect Rochester surveyed all candidates for Rochester’s Mayor and City Council to learn where they stand on issues related to transportation and mobility.

Candidates for Mayor:

Rachel Barnhart

Tony Micciche

James Sheppard

Lori F. Thomas

Mayor Lovely Warren

Alex White

Candidates for City Council:

Pam Davis

Shawn Dunwoody

Malik Evans

Scotty Ginett

Mitch Gruber

Dorian L. Hall

Ronald Hall

Tom Hasman

Andrew Hollister

Matt Juda

Ann Lewis

Willie Joe Lightfoot

Mary Lupien

Dana K. Miller

Jackie Ortiz

Loretta Scott

Marcus Williams

Cast Your Vote (just for funsies):

We’d like to ask for your help getting these films in front of as many people as we can. If you would like to host a mini screening of Rochester Street Films in your neighborhood, please contact us.

We’d like to ask for your help getting these films in front of as many people as we can. If you would like to host a mini screening of Rochester Street Films in your neighborhood, please contact us.

And we’d like to ask for your help getting these films in front of as many people as we can. If you would like to host a mini screening of Rochester Street Films in your neighborhood, please contact us.